Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in India

Anup Kumar Bhandari, Arun Sudarsan

Abstract


Labor regulation and employment relation has been investigated in India in light of the seminal work of Besley and Burgess (2004), considering formal sector manufacturing employment as the explained variable. Empirical findings support, although not very strongly, the institutionalist view, i.e., pro-worker amendment in labour laws induces employment. Among the other factors, real wage rate has significant negative effect on employment, whereas that for real per capita developmental capital expenditure, per capita electricity generation capacity and real per capita net state domestic product is significant positive. However, effect of per capita real developmental revenue expenditure is inconclusive. In other words, although it improves employability of workers through their human capital improvement, which is probablymet up at the cost of worsening overall infrastructural development, through reducing corresponding capital expenditure! Supporting evidence has also been provided favoring this conjecture. © 2016 Universidad ESAN.

Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the  CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).


Keywords


Labor regulation; Formal sector; Manufacturing employment; Liberalization

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 The bi-annual academic publication of Universidad ESAN

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The Universidad ESAN, with more than 50 years of experience in the higher education field and post graduate studies, desires to contribute to the academic community with the most outstanding pieces of research. We gratefully welcome suggestions and contributions from our readers in order to help
us hit our goals.